XXX Chats

attraction dating women

Dating service based on intelligence test

They have done so in a number of ways, including updating the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale so they better reflect the abilities of test-takers from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds.They have developed new, more sophisticated ways of creating, administering and interpreting those tests.

"I think we're at a really good point in our profession, where change can occur," he says, "and I think that what it's going to take is good data." Pushing the envelope The Kaufmans and Naglieri have worked within the testing community to effect change; their main concern is with the way tests are used, not with the basic philosophy of testing.His Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (STAT) is a battery of multiple-choice questions that tap into the three independent aspects of intelligence--analytic, practical and creative--proposed in his triarchic theory.Recently, Sternberg and his collaborators from around the United States completed the first phase of a College Board-sponsored Rainbow Project to put the triarchic theory into practice.But intelligence testing has also been accused of unfairly stratifying test-takers by race, gender, class and culture; of minimizing the importance of creativity, character and practical know-how; and of propagating the idea that people are born with an unchangeable endowment of intellectual potential that determines their success in life.Since the 1970s, intelligence researchers have been trying to preserve the usefulness of intelligence tests while addressing those concerns.(He has since added existential and naturalist intelligences.) But that formulation has had little impact on testing, in part because the kinds of quantitative factor-analytic studies that might validate the theory in the eyes of the testing community have never been conducted.Sternberg, in contrast, has taken a more direct approach to changing the practice of testing.In certain situations where intelligence tests are currently being used, the consensus answer appears to be "no." A recent report of the President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education (PCESE), for example, suggests that the use of intelligence tests to diagnose learning disabilities should be discontinued.For decades, learning disabilities have been diagnosed using the "IQ-achievement discrepancy model," according to which children whose achievement scores are a standard deviation or more below their IQ scores are identified as learning disabled.For Naglieri, however, it is clear that there is still a great demand for intelligence tests that can help teachers better instruct children with learning problems.The challenge is convincing people that tests such as the CAS--which do not correlate highly with traditional tests--still measure something worth knowing.

Comments Dating service based on intelligence test